Crime forms a significant part of our history and there is a need for knowledge exchange, collaboration and innovation in relation to the preservation, presentation and transmission of Our Criminal Ancestors.
Shore has an extensive body of work and international reputation in crime history, including her work on juvenile offenders, and her more recent research into the social and cultural history of crime from the 18th to the early 20th Centuries. A key theme which has run throughout this work has been to reveal the ‘experience’ and ‘agency’ of offenders.
This body of research informed Shore’s desire to work with research practitioners, such as curators and archivists, and with the public who ‘consume’ historical research via their research into family histories. The standard story of crime history that is told via heritage sites is one which speaks to a presumption of continuing progress in the criminal justice system – the past is presented as unnecessarily violent (capital and corporal punishment stories predominate in the public history sites), as unjust to individuals (since individual stories are the route by which the history is told) and are often sensationalist in their focus (for example, gallows stories, transportation stories), with the unintended consequence that empathy for the criminal and no accounts of victims is a common trait. The sense that ‘things are better now’ is a story that historical research suggests should be told in much more nuanced ways.